Meaningful Cuban Initiative?

Better late than even later.

Plaudits to City Council for showing common sense and enlightened self-interest by formally agreeing (5-0) to be the catalyst for bringing together local and national officials to brainstorm on a plan for improving Tampa-Cuban relations. Imagine, pursuing any and all opportunities for trade during a recession! But it’s a start, however belated.

The good news is that an all-call will go out to key players: from Mayor Pam Iorio to representatives of the Hillsborough County Commission, Hillsborough County Aviation Authority, the Tampa Port Authority and Tampa-area congressional delegation. The flip side: these are the same players who have been initiative-challenged forever on this subject. At best, settling for incremental progress, such as pushing — without result yet — for direct Tampa-to-Havana flights.

Moreover, there is the ever-possible scenario that anything to do with Cuba — an incongruous  relic of American Cold War foreign policy — is still an intimidating, political hot potato to some. And consequently these well-intentioned plans could easily get “committeed” to death.

Steve Michelini, the managing director of Tampa’s World Trade Center, was direct in what this city’s agenda should be: “Tampa must be more active and more aggressive in becoming a trading partner with Cuba.” Added well-connected Tampa gadfly Al Fox: “This is a local issue. Cuba is open. We’re shutting ourselves out.”

Indeed, although the counterproductive federal embargo is now in its 48th year, U.S. law does permit exports of agricultural products and medicines as well as medical and telecommunications equipment to Cuba.

 And while officials gather and work on a plan that could benefit the state, the region, the port and the city, look who’s actually going to Cuba this month.

According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, it will be Georgia Gov. Sonny Purdue. He’ll be leading his state’s trade delegation. The free-market Republican wants a trade upgrade from Georgia’s approximately $42.5 million in farm-product exports (mostly frozen chicken) to Cuba.

“Georgia is strategically located to Cuba with Hartsfield Jackson International Airport and both of our ports,” pointed out Heidi Green, deputy commissioner for global commerce with the Georgia Department of Economic Development. She makes an excellent point. Why wouldn’t Florida’s northern neighbor want to take advantage of its “strategic location?” Who wouldn’t?

Ybor Update: Zoning Irony

Here’s another version of the man-bites-dog syndrome.

We know that in this city you can’t open a bar within 1,000 feet of a church. Makes sense. There’s plenty of precedent and lots of obvious reasons.

But how about opening a church within 1,000 feet of a bar? Who would want to? Who cares?

Actually, some Ybor City property owners with wet zoning probably do care. That’s because the Church of Scientology, not to be confused with a cathedral of Christian convention, is greatly expanding its token presence — an 8th Avenue information center — in Ybor City. The COS recently purchased the Ybor Square complex.

It also bought some uncertainty, if not unease, among some bottom-line neighbors.

Will COS “parishioners” patronize local establishments? Will Scientology’s shear presence and proselytizing reputation amount to a stress-test for surrounding businesses?  Or will it amount to much ado about nothing — except for that matter of a city block coming off the tax rolls during a recession?

That’s Show Biz

Shouldn’t the Erin Andrews’ saga — from being violated by a peeping pervert to becoming a national celebrity on “Dancing With The Stars” — be a consummate feel-good story, especially for those of us here in her home town?  

And, yet, it doesn’t feel that way. Probably has everything to do with the way she has exploited her peephole violation: By being part of an erotic, bed-prop samba with her dancing partner, with whom she may or may not be having an ongoing relationship. Wink. Wink. Inquiring tabloids want to know.

We don’t.

We liked her better when she was doing her job as an ESPN sideline reporter: Being frat-boy eye candy and asking football coaches what changes they would make in the second half.

Rhetorical Excess In Politics

Here’s a suggestion for candidates in political races. It has nothing to do with 527 groups or negative campaigns or party credit cards or Croesus-rich candidates. Just this. Could we agree to a moratorium on certain phrases that have lost their meaning through overuse and underperformance? For starters:

*”For the people.” Who else? Surely, not the evil-doing special interests. This includes anyone running for governor without a party affiliation.

*”For a change.” Indeed. Avoid political clichés for a real change.

*”Making a difference.” It should be obvious by what you propose. If not, a hackneyed slogan surely won’t make any difference.

*”Accountability.” Can’t it just be assumed that you and every member of the electorate are decidedly in favor of accountability? Just get on with your agenda.

* “Walk the walk.” You’re still talking the rhetorical talk.  

* “Best thing since sliced bread.” Actually “iPad” works a lot better and ups your hip quotient.

*”Pork.” That’s other politicians’ community-benefiting projects. Don’t denounce it unless you’re without earmark sin.

*”Nazi.” Unless we’re talking crimes against humanity or a Seinfeldian (“soup Nazi”) parody, avoid it. It’s a cheap-shot device for demonizing the opposition. Can erode whatever moral high ground you deign to claim. And, yes, it applies to the current immigration debate.

*”In a recent poll.”  Unless you can site sampling specifics, including how the questions were worded and to whom addressed, please refrain. You can find — or commission — a poll to show anything.

*”Creative solutions.” Permissible only if you haven’t trafficked in any of the above.

Value-Added Challenge

Teaching, as anyone who has ever been a teacher or a student knows, is a hybrid process, one not given easily to outcome quantification. So many variables. The classroom is not a widget shop.

And yet, kids, involved parents, fellow teachers, police resource officers, guidance counselors, administrators and probably school bus drivers and cafeteria personnel can tell you who the good teachers are. It’s that obvious; it’s that acknowledged. They’re tough; they’re demanding; they’re fair; they’re consistent; they’re funny; they’re creative; they’re spontaneous and they’re relevant and respected. Dedication is a given. Their reputations precede them. Class to class, year to year.

Everybody also knows who’s ineffective because they’re boring or discipline-challenged. They know who’s been using the same lesson plan from a generation ago. They also know who’s frazzled and hopes to escape to guidance counseling or administration.

I trust the county’s $200-million partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will validate these real-world verities through its various assessment and accountability tools. But I confess to being particularly skeptical of the district’s plan to hire a consultant whose job will be to measure the year-to-year, “value-added” contribution of every teacher to every student.

“We need formulas for every teacher of every subject,” explains David Steele, Hillsborough’s chief information and technology officer who has now added the title of project director, Empowering Effective Teachers Grant.

There’s value, to be sure, in fairly assessing teacher effectiveness and rewarding accordingly. Teachers and students deserve no less. But there’s also value in knowing what doesn’t lend itself to formulaic quantification. Anyone not think making a difference in a kid’s life is, by definition,  rife with subjectivity? Anyone not think coming up short may be attributable to factors beyond the teacher’s control?  Anyone not think this might be a formula for formula’s sake?

Money Matters In Gubernatorial Race

Sure, the meteoric political rise of Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Scott can be attributed to all that money he’s spending. More than $6 million of his own on TV ads alone. It speaks volumes about a system that puts name recognition and ostensible credibility for sale. But it probably says even more about the notably lackluster candidates also in the hunt.

Speaking of Scott, the uber rich former CEO of the HCA hospital chain, nobody should get credit for “taking responsibility,” such as for what resulted in HCA paying $1.7 billion in fraud fines and settlements, if they use the passive voice. Scott does. “Mistakes were made” is a parsed, clichéd, less-than-responsible response.    

Don’t Ask, Don’t Yell

The Pentagon and Congress continue to ponder the implications of gays serving openly in the military for the first time. What to do exactly with “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”?

Here’s a suggestion. Expand it. “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Don’t Yell. But If You Want To Tell, Do so. No Harm Done Because It’s None of Anybody’s Business.” Besides, America can use all the qualified personnel willing to sign on to combat terrorist adversaries.

But if you really, really must single out any group these days, it would make more sense to start with West Virginia prison guards who are part of National Guard units. Anybody remember Abu Ghraib? Nobody knows how many American lives that continues to cost.

Red Crossing The Line

Nobody doesn’t like the Red Cross. It goes where others fear to tread and ministers to those in need. Politics and affiliations notwithstanding. It’s about humanity. They’ve been treating war-wounded for more than 150 years. Who doesn’t get that?

Having said that, a case can be made for an exception. The International Red Cross’ neutrality policy continues to justify its practice of giving first aid training and kits to Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. Arguably, neutrality is not the appropriate response to those who would strategically target innocents, regardless of age or gender.

The Red Cross does, however, make a concession of sorts. Part of its three-day first-aid courses includes opportunities to show participants the need to abide by the Geneva Conventions. The conduct-of-war rules that the Taliban violate with impunity.