Time Was Right For McKay To Exit

The National Football League is an exception to a lot of rules. We won’t even bother counting the ways. Suffice it to say that celebrity double standards and an obscenely subsidized marketplace are two of them.

But here’s one that does apply. Timing is everything. A Super Bowl, for example, doesn’t happen without the right coach at the right time orchestrating and exhorting injury-free personnel to play their best when it counts the most.

For the Bucs, the ill-fated tenure of Hugh Culverhouse never would have happened had not the finances of the original ownership group collapsed. Had John McKay not been the Buc head coach, Tampa Bay likely would have drafted Tony Dorsett instead of USC’s Ricky Bell. Had not the Community Investment Tax been passed, the Bucs would have beaten the Browns to Baltimore. And had Rich McKay not been the front man, the CIT wouldn’t have carried.

Had Steve Spurrier not turned down the Bucs, Tony Dungy would never have had the opportunity to turn them around. Had Warren Sapp not had off-the-field issues at Miami, he never would have been available to the Bucs on draft day. Had Jon Gruden not been heading into the lame-duck year on his Oakland contract, he would not have been available to the Glazers at any extorted price.

And had several well-chronicled events not occurred, Rich McKay would still be the Bucs’ general manager.

The most obvious of those was the hiring of Gruden, the charismatic, creative genius with the successfully amoral, win-now mantra. It was hoped that he could complement the look-to-tomorrow, community-conscious paragon of probity that was McKay.

The timing was hardly fortuitous. But not just because the volatile Gruden and the low-key McKay were as different as Ray Lewis and Derek Brooks. It was simply the final act of a two-act drama.

The first act was played ham-handedly by the Glazers who paid McKay well to swallow his pride. Recall the shabby scenarios involving the firing of Dungy, the courtship of Bill Parcells and the back-door channels to Gruden. McKay was trumped and waived off the case after he had all but signed up Marvin Lewis as head coach.

The Glazers gave McKay a handsome new contract, however, and the humiliation presumably subsided. But never disappeared.

When Gruden came in, he took a close look at what he had. Sure, the offensive line was an issue, but right off he saw that he had more than a highly skilled, Pro Bowl wideout who could block. He also saw that Keyshawn Johnson was an over-paid, over-rated, over-the-top annoyance who couldn’t put team first. Reportedly, he told insiders that Johnson, who snubbed early mini-camps, was the one player he just didn’t like.

Johnson’s big mouth and big contract also had come at the expense of top draft choices. Johnson at his worst was a recurring reminder of who had cut the deal for him: McKay.

Ditto for the whiney, lazy, immature, underachieving offensive tackle Kenyata Walker, for whom the Bucs and McKay had spent a number one draft choice and a lot of money. Gruden didn’t even let him dress out for the 2002 season opener.

McKay had a reputation for going after “character guys,” and Brooks and John Lynch were typically cited. But McKay had also saddled Gruden with Johnson and Walker, who were distracting, annoying “caricature” guys.

And then there was the guy who wasn’t there: Warrick Dunn, the all-purpose back whom Gruden wanted retained for whatever it would have cost. Dunn signed a lucrative free-agent deal with Atlanta.

Sure, McKay and Gruden disagreed over roster help — from Emmitt Smith to Kyle Turley — and McKay was weary of his “Dr. No” role. But an ill-timed breach of in-house confidence undermined the relationship even more. In fact, it punctured any lingering Super Bowl euphoria last summer. That’s when Gruden — at an NFL convention — spoke in unflattering terms about McKay and his reluctance to pull the trigger on personnel acquisitions favored by Gruden.

At a certain point, even a wealthy pillar of this community who bled orange and then pewter for the Buccaneers, couldn’t live with that kind of disrespect. McKay became rich man, poor-mouthed. For an executive who was extremely well-regarded around the league, he had become a frustrated, humiliated, under-appreciated prophet in his home town.

But Gruden didn’t push McKay out the door. He prodded him. The door had already been flung open by the Glazers.

And no less important to McKay, who had largely grown up with the Bucs, was that he was no longer leaving “family.” He was merely leaving a franchise and a job — albeit in a city he genuinely loves. Tampa’s still a community; Atlanta’s all marketplace.

If the Bucs’ window of Super Bowl opportunity has, indeed, closed for now, McKay’s departure, however awkward, could prove well-timed. For him. If a resurgent, Michael Vick-led Falcon franchise soon returns to the playoff status it enjoyed just one year ago, McKay’s move could look even better.

Timing is everything.

“Moral Courage” Award?

Hillsborough County’s “Moral Courage Award,” the well-intentioned brainchild of Jan Platt, has been around since the early 1990s. It’s designed to recognize those who manifest moral courage and high ethical standards.

It conjures up Atticus Finch-like images and Silkwoodian scenarios.

Instead, we get a mixed bag of activists and agenda drivers, some of whom would be more appropriately eligible for a “Chutzpah Award,” a “Self-Interest Award” or an “Up Yours Award.” Among this year’s nominees are strip club owner Joe Redner and Speak Up Tampa Bay, the non-profit group in charge of a lot of bad public access television. Last year’s nominees included grandstanding Commissioner Ronda Storms, who challenged Speak Up, and then-Mayor Dick Greco, who took a trip to Cuba.

There’s no taking the politics — or the silliness out of it. But some of the nominations, such as Redner’s, are demeaning.

Three options:

1)Call it a better ideal than idea. Then call it off.

2)Don’t give it out every year.

3)Add Luke Lirot, White Chocolate, Tony Daniel and Don Connolly to this year’s nominees.

Food For The Thoughtless

Steve Kersker, the former drug addict who found religion and a cause — the homeless — has apparently found another cause: the thoughtless.

Kersker and his homeless troops were no-shows for a Thanksgiving meal at Carrabba’s in St. Petersburg. The reason, according to Kersker: a “bait-and-switch” deceit. Carrabba’s was merely providing the venue. The food was being prepared elsewhere.

In addition to misplaced umbrage, this is a new low in ingratitude.

It’s also a new low in stupidity. The meal was prepared by the Palm restaurant.

Finally Time For Channelside

Three years ago this month, Tampa hosted Super Bowl XXXV. Right before the $45-million Channelside entertainment area opened. Talk about timing.

When Channelside did open, it was in piecemeal fashion. In fits and starts — and departures. Talk was more of vacancies and competition from Centro Ybor than of a place to hang out and have fun. Tampa’s Chamber of Commerce wound up taking space to help jumpstart the complex.

Fast forward to now. Stumps Supper Club is a success, and Howl At The Moon does well on weekends. But it’s the new tenants and their $10 million in investment that have made the marketplace take note. No one remembers the last rites for Pop City. The buzz is all about the new mix at Channelside — as well as its role in Channel District synergy and its part in plans for Tampa to create an increasingly attractive destination for visitors and locals.

“It looks like a good mix,” assesses Karen Brand, vice president for marketing for the Tampa Bay Convention and Visitors Bureau. “It gives us a great package to sell to groups.”

Nothing embodies change at Channelside more than Hooters. The ultra successful, high-energy, wings-beers-and-babes restaurant occupies Channelside’s northwest corner and fronts — uh, beacon-like — Channelside Drive.

Hooters also brings a Channelside order of savvy marketing. It has a radio studio. It offers the “Hooters Express,” a free HARTline bus shuttle to accommodate the downtown lunch crowd. There are co-promotions with The Forum and possibly “bon voyage” parties for cruise customers.

“We love collectively bringing the market here and then letting it bounce around to the other places,” says Hooters’ co-founder Ed Droste.

Directly above Hooters is the 250-seat Signature Room Grille, scheduled to open in February. It will feature 1930s dinner club ambience and live jazz. It’s the first venture outside the Chicago market for owner Rick Roman, who also owns the Signature Room near the top of the John Hancock Center in downtown Chicago.

“Tampa is the perfect town for us,” says Roman. “A strong business community, a growing tourism base, nice weather and we’re on the water. What’s not to like about the potential around us? We love this location.”

And what of the juxtaposition with Hooters?

“We love the exposure,” deadpans Roman.

Other high profile newcomers include: Splitsville, 27,000 square feet of high-end, retro-look bowling alley; Grill 29 steak house; TinaTapas and Cold Stone Creamery. Channelside is 80 per cent leased. According to Susan Martin, marking director for Channelside leasing agent CB Richard Ellis, retail is being targeted for the remaining 20 percent.

“More clothing, a souvenir shop, perhaps a day spa,” says Martin. “We have stuff in the works.”

To Hurricane Pass Outfitters owner Bruce Rabon, his yearlong wait has been worth it.

“They said they were going to aggressively market the center, and they have,” notes Rabon. “I think the restaurant and entertainment components will be phenomenal. I recently told a business acquaintance, ‘You wait another year and you won’t be able to afford it.'”

Channelside opened ahead of its time, points out Christine Burdick, president of the Tampa Downtown Partnership. “But now it’s the right space for the right time. It’s in the heart of an area with other attractions, such as The Forum and the Aquarium. It’s on the way to Ybor — by trolley. And it’s so close to the most eclectic neighborhood in Tampa.”

Indeed, Channelside will benefit from burgeoning neighborhood development. From tony lofts to pricey condo towers, more than 1,500 residential units are in the works for various projects in the Channel District. Nearby Harbour Island will soon be built out — and home to 8,000 residents. In fact, 88,000 people currently live within a mile radius of downtown.

It should also be helped by a sizable hike in cruise passengers — to an estimated 800,000 in fiscal ’03 — plus plans for several more downtown hotels, including a 400-unit Embassy Suites across from the Tampa Convention Center.

The final piece in the short, closely scrutinized evolution of Channelside will be a subtraction. That’s when the chamber leaves to make way for a more entertaining tenant.

Timing is everything.

Channelside Tenants

Banana Joe’s Island Party

Grille 29

Cold Stone Creamery

Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce

Ciara’s

Howl At The Moon

Cigars by Antonio

Hurricane Pass Outfitters

Channelside Cinemas and IMAX

Joffrey’s Coffee

Margarita Mama’s

Tampa Bay Information Center

Paintings Of The World

TinaTapas

Signature Room Grille (Opening)

Wine Design

Splitsville

White House Gear

Stump’s Supper Club

Quoteworthies

The newcomer: “We saw the Channelside Shops location with new major restaurants coming in, the cruise ships increasing their visits as a perfect spot

USF’s Alumni: Coming Of Age

Earlier this month USF awarded some 3,200 degrees. It brought its alumni total to more than 180,000.

This means USF, a 40-something university, is now reaching a critical mass of graduates. But it’s more than the raw numbers. For USF, it means a number of alumni are reaching the point where they can give back — sometimes in a very significant way.

This reality was underscored recently when a member of USF’s inaugural graduating class — 1963 — pledged $5 million from his estate to USF. Moreover, a state match will increase the total to $7.5 million.

“There are no free lunches,” said Jack Boyd Jr., 62, who earned a marketing degree in 1963 and later became wealthy as a stock broker and real estate investor. “This university has been good to me, so you have to give back.”

The gift from Boyd and his USF-grad wife, Janis, is the largest alumni gift for USF.

For now.

Brandon Wrestlers: Big Fish In A Big Pond

Congratulations are nothing new to the Brandon High School Wrestling program. The Eagles have won a bunch of state championships. But even more notably, every time the Eagles win a match, they set a new national record for consecutive victories. It currently stands at a mind-numbing 375 — across 30 years. Moreover, the program keeps getting better.

But special congratulations are now due for Brandon’s performance in a recent national tournament. Brandon finished second in the prestigious Walsh Jesuit 2003 Ironman Wrestling Tournament in Ohio. That’s second among the nation’s elite.

For years, some disgruntled coaches have sour-graped Brandon’s generation-long achievement, saying that was only against local competition. As if Brandon were merely the biggest fish in a very modest-sized pond.

Let the record show: Brandon is a very big fish in the biggest of ponds.

Boondocking Kobe

When you’re wrong, the honorable thing is to own up to it. I thought the primary — and quite possibly only — reason that a number of newspapers carried “The Boondocks” was because of its minority orientation. And I thought that a pretty shabby rationale for strip that was not, well, particularly funny. As a result, I concluded, the strip had very little, if any, value.

Wrong. Its value is in politically incorrect commentary that wouldn’t be otherwise included. Not even “Doonesbury.”

For example, the recent “Boondocks” strip where the kid and the grandfather are watching a Lakers’ game on TV. The announcer’s voice says, “The Denver Nuggets revealed their new game plan against the Los Angeles Lakers today, which involves the strategic placement of several 19-year-old white girls immediately behind the Lakers’ basket.”

One more thing.

As comic-strip parody, that still would have worked even had there not been a celebrated rape case involving Kobe Bryant. The NBA. It is what it is.

Rush To Judgment Leaves Doubts, Says Davis

In the aftermath of Sept. 11, Congressman Jim Davis signed on to the Patriot Act. There had been — and arguably still were and are — terrorists in our midst. He later supported the president on the use of force in Iraq to enforce United Nations’ resolutions. He saw merit in the military prerogative of pre-emption.

Now count Davis among those with major misgivings on all three.

At the recent Tiger Bay Club of Tampa luncheon, Davis said the Patriot Act now needs to be re-evaluated.

“Parts now need to be trimmed back,” he acknowledged. “A judge, fundamentally, should always be in the loop.” He also said that the ambiguity shrouding the U.S. military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the disposition of enemy combatants “disturbs me enormously.”

“Ultimately, we are judged on our moral authority,” opined Davis. “And we’ve lost some ground.”

The war in Iraq now seems to belie its justification, intimated Davis. It’s no longer about a despotic regime believed to be developing weapons of mass destruction. Davis supported military force when WMD was the rationale. Now he has serious doubts.

“I’m concerned with what I know today,” stated Davis. “I’ll reserve judgment for now, but I’m only as good as the information I’m relying on.”

He speculated that the President’s motivation was driven — at a gut level — by a sense of “Never again on my watch.” And he went for it — with most of the country queuing up behind him.

The President, said Davis, would have been better off leveling with the American people about the “chance,” however small, that Iraq was “doing business” with Al Qaeda and might be a WMD menace.

“But the President didn’t say that,” recalled Davis. “He said there was ‘new evidence.'”

Davis’ reservation on the pre-emption policy is that it “isn’t clear enough,” he explained.

“We should reserve the right to go it alone if necessary,” he allowed. “A pre-emptive act can be appropriate” — but must be engaged in “judiciously.”

“I will not cite Iraq as a model,” he concluded.

For the record, Davis believes the American military needs to “stay the course.” It also needs more help.

“We need to be reaching out to our allies,” he said. “You know how many Canadian troops there are in Iraq? One. We also need more Arab-speaking soldiers and civilian workers.”

Davis, who was in Iraq last month, said he was impressed with U.S. Central Command chief General John Abizaid. “He’s highly skilled,” said Davis. “But I asked how many other senior military officials speak Arabic. No one could name one.”

Davis agrees that the U.S. “misjudged” the extent to which oil production could underwrite reconstruction efforts. But he disagrees with naysayers who maintain that Iraqi is just too different — too tribal — for nation-building to really succeed. Nor is it necessarily a Vietnam redux.

“Yes, they (Iraqis) are different, but there are some remarkable similarities,” noted Davis, who pointed out how much Iraqis wanted security and how students expressed ambitions to be teachers and doctors.

“Remember, Iraq has enormous resources and a relatively high literacy rate,” said Davis. “The potential is enormous. Nation-building can be done, even though, yes, it’s tribal. We get pretty tribal ourselves on Sundays.”

There are two fundamental tenets the Iraqis need to absorb, emphasized Davis. One is “to disagree in a civil fashion.” The other is that “power should be transitory

Big Task: Big Idea

There’s no denying that Ed Turanchik thinks big. And you know what? Somebody has to.

Tampa’s urban innards — the part between downtown and Ybor City — doesn’t need a makeover. It needs a start over. What it needs is of a scale that can’t be provided by a housing authority, federal grants notwithstanding. What the Central Park Village area needs is more than an islet of nicer, subsidized housing in a sea of economic disadvantage and neglect.

It needs 157 acres worth of massive investment that can only emanate from the private sector.

Turanchik’s company, Civitas, has stepped up publicly after having quietly acquired control or options on hundreds of lots. It proposes a mix of residential — both “market rate” and “affordable” — and retail development. A factory for manufactured housing and expanded public park areas are also part of the plan.

Civitas is backed by prominent investors such as Lazydays RV SuperCenter owner Don Wallace and Westchase developer Bill Bishop. Vince Naimoli could use pockets like that.

Civitas needs the cooperation of the housing authority and approval from the city for a master-planned community. The ultra-ambitious plan involves scenarios dependent on a community redevelopment area, tax-increment financing and tax credits.

Questions yet remain; details beg scrutiny.

But this much is evident. A project of this magnitude can only be pulled off by those who think big, dream big and ask “why not?” It cannot be accomplished by the public sector, self-appointed empowerment advocates and the usual naysaying suspects.

Bad Santa: Bad Movie

You’ve probably heard the caveats about “Bad Santa,” the scatological, cruel-yule send-up. The warning is to not, repeat NOT, bring the kids to this R-rated holiday fare. I think that heads-up should be broadened: Do not bring yourself either.

The movie is doing well at the box office, and both local dailies — as well as the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and others — found “Bad Santa” worthy of recommendation. You know the approach: wink-wink-we-know-we’re-all-too-hip-not-to-appreciate-the-outrageous-hilarity-embedded-in-this-iconoclastically-funny-work-that-to-the-uninitiated-is-nothing-more-than-an-inappropriately-irreverent-exercise-in-crudeness-vulgarity-profanity-violence-and-sex.

Find a babysitter and go laugh yourself silly or incontinent — just like “Bad Santa” himself.The promos inform us that Roger Ebert ostensibly said — in some context — that “Bad Santa” was “unreasonably funny.” Whatever that means.

It probably means it’s the times we live in. A lot of people seemingly liked the “Blair Witch Project” too. Maybe it was because they didn’t want to appear unenlightened about cinema verite in the form of hand-held cameras and amateur actors. I thought it was a hoax of Piltdown proportions.

Maybe, in “Bad Santa’s” case, there’s a perverse sort of cachet in not acknowledging that you couldn’t divine the vulgar inventiveness. Maybe no movie stinks if its director is “auteur” enough.

Anyway, “Bad Santa” does not transcend its coarseness and poor taste. It’s not funny. It’s boring. It’s mean-spirited. It’s sad. “Bad Santa” is a bad movie. It just is.